Women’s Week.

Another post from ages ago!

I’m still in contact with the science fiction club at the nearby university where I studied. Mostly, I’m friends with the older kids who will be graduating soon. Occasionally, I get dragged out of the grumpy old-guard box, dusted off and asked to help them out with something. This time around it was their Women’s Week celebration stall. They wanted to be able to recommend books pointing out that SF&F isn’t quite as alienating and misogynistic as it seems when your exposure is Game of Thrones, and The Avengers movie. This is a cause I can get right behind, so I agreed to turn up to provide stickers and a recommendations  list of awesome books and comics about and by women.

At the stall itself showing my usual charm and winning personality to the young ones.

At the stall itself showing my usual charm and winning personality to the young ones. Photo taken by my housemate.

Of course, I left it to the last minute, so the lists are rather rushed.

Speculative Fiction Books:

  • The Left Hand of Darkness by Ursula Le Guin
  • Cards of Grief by Jane Yolen
  • The Ladies of Mandrigyn by Barbara Hambly
  • The Speed of Dark by Elizabeth Moon
  • Palimpsest by Cat Valente
  • Frankenstein by Mary Shelley
  • The Time Traveler’s Wife by Audrey Niffenegger
  • The Female Man by Joanna Russ
  • Dreamsnake by Vonda McIntyre.
  • Boneshaker by Cherie Priest
  • Nylon Angel by Marianne De Pierres
  • Synners by Pat Cadigan
  • To Say Nothing of the Dog by Connie Willis
  • The Mists of Avalon by Marion Zimmer Bradley
  • Shards of Honor by Lois McMaster Bujold
  • Grass by Sheri Tepper
  • Where Late the Sweet Birds Sang by Kate Wilhelm
  • Mappa Mundi by Justina Robertson
  • Dawn (Lilith’s Brood #1) by Octavia Butler
  • The Snow Queen by Joan Vinge
  • The Forgotten Beasts of Eld by Patricia McKillip

Comic Books (individual trades):

  • Fun Home by Alison Bechdel
  • Captain Marvel: In Pursuit of Flight by Kelly Sue Deconnick
  • Womanthology: Heroic (by various, organised by Renae De Liz)
  • Friends with Boys by Faith Erin Hicks
  • Hopeless Savages by Jen Van Meter
  • Wonder Woman: The Circle by Gail Simone

Comic Book Series

  • Birds of Prey v1 by Gail Simone, DC
  • Powergirl by Jimmy Palmiotti, Justin Grey and Amanda Conner, DC
  • Madame Xanadu by Matt Wagner and Amy Reeder Hadley, Vertigo
  • X-23 by Majorie Liu, Marvel

I did try for a variety of sub-genres and both explicitly and implicitly feminist books. I keep looking at it thinking it needs improvements, I mean it’s pretty much all white straight women, with a bend towards fantasy.

I’m not entirely comfortable with that.

My weak rationalisations: I was limited by trying to go for the ‘oh yeah, I’ve heard that mentioned before’ effect (especially in nerds) but not for a lot of super obvious stuff like J.K. Rowling. I also wanted to limit the amount of YA, going instead for 80s/90s books that have a younger audience, but predate the idea of the YA genre as defined by marketing. I’m also avoiding short stories, which takes away a lot of awesome stuff I’ve been reading. Uni students, even the SF and geeky ones around here, aren’t exactly the most well-read of creatures. I’d like to think it’s because they are too busy studying, but well… I can remember being a uni student.

Anyway, there’s a definite need for improvement. Hopefully if I’m asked again next year, I’ll be able to come up with something better. If nothing else, I’ll be more organised.

Suggestions for next time welcome! I’ll probably still be in contact with a few of the kids next year!

When Life is busy.

Edit: Whoops! I thought this went up Thursday evening. Sorry for those I would have confused with that.

Not much has been happening here lately. I’ve been incredibly ill due to sinus infections and the flu on top of my boss going overseas, so I’ve been alone in the office at work. I haven’t even been reading, things have been so busy. It all started around  two months ago, when I dyed my hair blue.

Not great shot of me fooling around after my haircut.

That same day, I finally got around to creating a subscription at my local comic store. The next Fridays, I got to pick up the first batch of my orders. I’ve picked up more since, but the first had me very excited.

I was trying to hide how sick I looked in this picture. I don’t think it worked. Also I’ll be completely honest, I have not had the time to read any of them. 🙁

For those interested, the subs I am currently getting are:

  • Batman
  • Batgirl
  • World’s Finest
  • Nightwing
  • JLDark
  • All Star Western

A few Saturdays ago I went to my first ever roller derby bout. Roller derby in Perth still seems to be in that fun setting-up phase. There are various leagues and groups that aren’t quite finished or organised yet from what I can tell, but goddamn am I jealous of the girls that can play. It’ll be even more awesome if and when they get enough funding and community support to really get going.

Sunday was Supanova, the big Australia-wide pop culture expo. I spent most of the day on the Swancon table, but did get a chance to go hunting for books. Managed to pick up Brubaker’s Catwoman: Relentless trade (which I’ve been looking for, for ages) and a paperback copy of Simone’s BoP End Run. I also picked up three very pretty signed prints of Batgirl, Supergirl and Terry McGuiness’ Batman from Peter Nguyen.

The best part of the day was getting my copy of The Deep signed by Tom Taylor. It’s not every day you judge an Award (the Aurealis last year) and get to have the winner sign it.

I’m really enjoying the DC Nation and Comixology apps since I got an iPad3 (or whatever) now named Ragdoll. 99 cents for a digital comic makes buying loads of singles stupidly easy, but I don’t really understand why you would buy (in print) trades on the device. I’m pretty unimpressed with the iPad in general, though – I think it wants to tell me how to do things rather than do things how I tell it.

"But then... I wonder what it's like to fuck a butterfly?"

Engraved appropriately. Except for Apple’s fucking censorship.

I made it to the Revelation Film Festival’s showing of Wonder Woman: A History of the Superheroine in Pop Culture, despite being horribly ill. Fantastic to see a product I helped fund via kickstarter on the big screen. And getting to meet Kelcy Edwards was very cool. I even got a picture with her but that is on my iphone that is in Australia.
I’ve also seen The Dark Knight Rises and Magic Mike, but those deserve their own posts. Somewhere in all this I also created a tumblr, http://catsinnedlands.tumblr.com because I keep meeting so many on my walks around the neighbourhood.

My partner has now finished his dissertation which means, as of a few days ago, I’m now in the US for three months of traveling and adventure (without him). I’m going to try and keep the podcast and reviews on this site going, but I suspect it’ll remain sporadic at best.

Those of you that live in the US and want to meet me or help with any of these, feel free to email. So far all I know of my plans is I’m likely to be visiting Seattle, Vancouver, San Francisco, Portland, Los Angeles and Denver. I don’t really have set dates or anything but I am considering Chicago and New York if anyone wants to convince me to swing that way. I’m also open to guest podcasters or reviews or ideas for this site.

Malafrena

I finished this book yesterday. It won’t get out of my head.

I have no fucking idea what to say about it.

It’s difficult for me to describe this book. It has been by far the hardest book I’ve read in a long time. I don’t know whether its because of  my tiredness recently making Le Guin’s prose more difficult to parse, or whether her normally flowing words are made more stilted by the genre change.  It is after all, as the back of the book says:

Le Guin’s  triumphant debut in mainstream fiction.

Triumphant? Maybe. Written in 1979, it does seem to lack the staying power of her other (and there are many) triumphant SF books. But then, I am mostly out of touch with both the literary and ‘mainstream’ fiction circles, so maybe it still is.

It really doesn’t help that I don’t know enough 19th century European history to have any context at all for this novel. I had no idea about whether this was alternative history or historical fiction for most of the book, which is to its detriment.  It is one of the few things Le Guin wrote in this setting, I believe the only other being her short stories, the Orsinian Tales.

Malafrena by Ursula LeGuin

I should probably back up a little at this point. Malafrena is essentially an alternative history about a fictional country under the control of Austria, post Napoleon. It’s a very detailed book, imitating that kind of 19th century prose and styling, with long descriptions of characters and surroundings as well as ever-long discussions by various old men drinking.  The pace often matches the provincial setting of the title’s country manor. I kept falling asleep and wanting to give up for the first half of the novel, there was so much dullness and naivete.

Thematically the book is a rich mix of cautionary revolution tale, with ideas of home, family and growing up, tied into an exploration of whether it is better to die free or live a slave. That’s not the whole story – a good portion of the book questions what freedom actually is, a question that is never really answered.

Overall it’s beautiful, it’s horrible, it’s fascinating but I don’t know if I like it. It is the worst of Le Guin’s books and I hate it for how empty it left me. It is the best of her books because while the first half was slow, the second half captured me utterly and won’t go the hell  away.

I preferred The Word for World is Forest, though. I still haven’t found any words at all to describe how I feel about that book other than a grossly simplistic ‘like Avatar but good’ comparison.

Excuses, excuses

I’ve been reading a lot recently. Unfortunately for this blog, most of what I’ve read has been in what I’ve been fondly calling my ‘crazy feminist’ phase, which has involved a lot of feminist theory and feminist SF. This is pretty challenging to me, in the sense that it’s feeding my theoretical framework and understandings of the genre and media. As I don’t have a lot of understanding of how to analyse a genre in relation to these theories, let alone provide a decent critical analysis of these theories themselves, it’s led to two things.

  • I have a lot of unfinished reviews sitting here that I’m not comfortable enough with to put on the interwebs. At some stage I’m going to have to re-read them all, but given that I’m currently messing around with the framework I’ve been using to create these reviews, it seems stupid to publish them now if I’m only going to be embarrassed in a month (instead of my usual 2-3 years before I start cringing).
  • I’m not understanding a lot of what I’m reading entirely. It’s good in the sense that being introduced to new ideas, concepts, and imaginings is what I love reading for, but it’s pretty terrible in terms of reviewing. The point of this blog was for me to practice my writing, but also practice the expression of my understanding. So until/unless a new motivation appears, no understanding means no review… or at least a horribly delayed review. This doesn’t include the podcast.

Anyway, English wank aside, if you’re interested in what specific texts I’ve been reading, I’ve created a goodreads account. I’ve found it a lot of fun. The tag and rate system has been working well for me, as it takes the pressure off and means I’m not frantically reading while attempting to think up something clever. The  user interface itself is terrible, but the concept is cool at least.

I’ve also been playing around with tumblr. I don’t understand tumblr in the slightest, but I have friends on it who seem to enjoy posting funny and silly jpegs. Also dcwomenkickingass is awesome, and easier to follow by having an account of my own.

Awhile ago I embarrassed myself on twitter, talking to local lecturer and @JimLee about the Wonder Woman pants issue. Both were cool about me being an idiot, and Lee was cool about me pushing for Superman to be shown in a mankini. Picassowary, a friend of mine who knows how important this idea is to me, adapted an image so we could see how it looked. After reading Red Hood and the Outlaws #1 today it feels appropriate to post.

Superman in a mankini

Invincible heroes don't need armour right? But they do need beer.

So with that final image, I leave you.

Where big words are used

I’m going to have to apologise, y’all. I was planning on writing a smart-alec foul-mouthed snark at a text, but then I finished this book and, well, it’s a grown-up book and deserves an attempt at a grown-up review.

Cover of The Rediscovery of Man

I have to admit this was mostly bought because I love these SF Masterwork covers.

I’d never heard of Cordwainer Smith till I picked up The Rediscovery of Man as part of my consumerist quest to have as many as possible of the older SF Masterworks books. It contains a series of short stories all set in the same future universe, at different periods in time and societal development. To be honest I wasn’t expecting much, but I wound up amazed and hooked.

It helps that Smith’s writing is perfect for a geography nerd such as myself. The stories cover different stages of future development in an expanding space empire, a purposeful allegory to colonialism, however it doesn’t just stop there. Moving throughout the various stages of development allows Smith to explore many of his themes, human adaptation, pioneering women, war, technical improvements, fights for equality as well as banishment and punishment for crime. These are all explored through a variety of points of views, across many different settings, allowing a complex understanding through relatively simple tales.

The theme of societal stagnation in the face of immortality and predictability as an exploration into what is needed for happiness was easily my favourite theme in a few of the latter stories and appeared to have the most imaginative handling. That said, the binary assumption that life needs death for meaning is an idea I think I’m getting a little tired of.

This isn’t your usual Star Trek-esque feel-good colonial ‘help the savages’ exploration fortunately. Smith uses his ‘underpeople’ as a metaphor for race, their animal origins an uncomfortable reminder, for me a white Australian, of how other races were* treated in British expansion and settlement. Some of these stories do ‘fail’ a little, but I certainly felt that often the flaws were a result of combining too many layers of metaphor and too many thoughts into relatively short and concise stories exploring too many issues. The main surprise, really, is how well and implicitly most of the themes have been built into the universe, rather than the awkwardly explicit tacked-on feel many well-intentioned stories attempting these themes have.

Even the most problematic story is still thought-provoking and ambiguous enough to work for a more modern reader, I think. Titled ‘The Crime and Glory of Commander Suzdal’, the plot centres around the idea of a planet in which ‘femininity becomes carcinogenic’ creating a one-gendered world. The story, on the surface, appears surprisingly homophobic and transphobic, and is somewhat out of place among the other stories. I’m not sure if this is a case where Smith was intending an allegory that is now a little lost as an unintentional but more literal meaning has been created/made more obvious through time, or it’s genuinely hateful in theme. In any case, I’ve read the story twice over and I’m still confused as to what the moral actually was, so I’m hesitant to be too harsh.

You can see how his stories influenced other writers too. The cover has quotes from Pratchett, Baxter and Le Guin telling everyone how inspiring and inventive his stories are. It’s not exactly a great stretch to compare the above story about a planet on which there is only one gender to Le Guin’s Left Hand of Darkness, and I’m sure a more detailed comparison would show more of its influence over the Hanish Cycle novels. This is probably a large part of the reason why I enjoyed these stories so much, actually – it’s that the grains of much greater stories are there were waiting to be developed beyond just colonialist allegory, even one as sophisticated as this one is.

I’m a little afraid I got too caught up in this book to be properly critical, I’d love to hear or read what other people have thought of Smith’s writing.

(*) I am using the past tense in a sort of wistful hope here.

Holiday Reading

Every Christmas I want to do the same thing: head south down to my family home, in a small Australian timber town. We tend not to do a lot, except laze in my parents house (which has been renovated and airconditioned since I moved out) while reading, playing games, watching TV and generally escaping the heat.

This year I stayed down there for six days. So, in preparation for not doing a lot, I packed a backpack full of comic trades and books so heavy I had to take some out so that the stitching on the bag wouldn’t rip. Plus my Kobo.  When I arrived, I then promptly got distracted by catching up with family, friends and food to remember I had over a kilo of trade paperbacks in my bag, waiting for me. I did remember my books and Kobo though, so here have some thoughts on the books I polished off.

Hound of The Baskervilles
It’s a little embarrassing but I really loved the 2009 Sherlock Holmes movie, so since then I’ve been steadily going through all the Arthur Conan Doyle stories I can find (and conveniently many came free with my Kobo). Hound of the Baskervilles is a pretty solid Holmes mystery, with perhaps the only unusual part being the amount of narration purely about Watson and his own actions. It is a case of my being spoiled by television though; I saw a TV-movie adaption of the story as a child and, well, knowing how it all ends takes a fair bit away from Sherlock stories, I think. Still, definitely a fun light read.

Nightwatch
I’m fairly sure this is the first time I’ve read a book translated from Russian and I think it may have lost something in translation. However, Sergei Lukyanenko wrote a cracking good novel (split into three stories) and while the book is flawed, with a confusing plot on top of simplistic and repetitive language, it is not without merit. The world-building is amazing and the characters (despite Anton’s tendency to angst about the difference between good and evil a little bit TOO much) are all likeable and relatively well fleshed out.

The back of my (cheap, paperback) copy has a quote from Time Out: ‘So good that the film feels like a trailer for it’. I loved the Nightwatch movie, but I agree the book has a coherency to it that the movie lacked and probably needed.

Three Hearts & Three Lions
I picked up this Poul Anderson book as it is part of the Gollancz ‘Millennium SF Masterworks’ series, which I’ve made a small hobby out of collecting (I love the pre-2010 numbered editions, they’re beautiful). I’m not really a huge Anderson fan; I find his language a little… dated, I guess? I can acknowledge that this book takes many digs at traditional fantasy and northern European mythology, but I can’t laugh at it, I just find it weird.

It is unfortunate that this book also happens to belong to a sub-genre of fantasy that I particularly hate, the ‘person wakes up in a high fantasy style alternative dimension’. I just cannot stand this genre and it always reminds me of terrible YA fiction. Considering that it pushes two major ‘put down’ buttons for me, it is a credit to Anderson that I did manage to finish the book quite easily and then afterwards be able to think ‘well it wasn’t that bad’.

Hm. I will write a post about a comic eventually. At the moment I’m in the middle of Song of Kali by Dan Simmons and Don Quixote by Miguel de Cervantes though so it might be awhile.